[tjoff]

Oh yes. Not the slightest hyperbole. That would be amazing.

What we have now really is a tragedy of the commons situation.

edit: Google maps (or equivalent) is a true game-changer that has a lot of value and one of the very few websites with actual value from javascript. But, we could just use Google Earth as a separate application for it. Just as we did in the early days when google maps on the web was a poor fit.

Very small price to pay.

[afavour]

But Google Earth was a terrible app with inconsistent UI! To my mind it’s one of the posterchildren of why making crossplatform native apps often ends up a total mess.

I feel like when everyone says “this should be a native app” their imagined app is absolutely flawless and integrates seamlessly on every OS. But reality has rarely matched that ideal.

[tjoff]

It was still orders of magnitude better than the web version so not sure what the argument is?

Today I'd use applications such as Slack and Spotify as posterchilds for bad applications. That they are built with web tech is not a coincidence.

[jakelazaroff]

Let’s take Google Docs as an example. A word processor where you can collaboratively edit a file with someone simply by sharing a link, without requiring anyone to install an application. How do you do this without the web and JavaScript?

[tjoff]

You don't. And that is not a problem worth sacrificing the web for.

[jakelazaroff]

That experience is one of the most empowering things we’ve ever invented. To me, “sacrificing the web” would be giving that up for your vision of purity.

[tjoff]

Is it that cumbersome to install an application?

[jakelazaroff]

Compared to just clicking a link and immediately having it working, yes. Installing software also has much bigger security implications than just visiting a website. And that’s if the application even works on my OS!

[tjoff]

Not having to install something does not even start to be "the most empowering thing we've ever invented" in my book.