Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hiptobecubic 1424 days ago
What I don't understand about this is what basis they could possibly have for making such a correction? The data is X, their algorithm says Y about it. Are they just claiming that "analysts" are better at triangulating than whatever their algorithm is? It's not like image classification, where it's at least plausible that a person can meaningfully "correct mistakes."
1 comments

Their profit depends on pleasing the police departments that make these requests. They probably thought nobody would ever find out or care, which is why they sued to keep journalists quiet.