[notrichmyself]

I don't strictly disagree with that, but I do think a significant amount of science (not all) should be led by rich people. Rich people aren't random, there is a natural selection in whom becomes rich. Imperfect as that selection process is, I think it is at least better than the alternatives of popular vote or bureaucrat decision. I say this not being rich myself.

I also believe a significant amount of science should be democratically driven.

[marcinzm]

>Rich people aren't random, there is a natural selection in whom becomes rich.

Generally it's the kids of rich parents.