|
|
|
|
|
by anonymouse008
1424 days ago
|
|
[edit] either don’t look up anything, or look up everything and write in a notebook dated, signed, preferably with a notary, about why your approach is different. Honestly with the way the USPTO goes about issuing patents makes everything super easy to refute as well as defend - it all comes down to court procedure: timing of motions, evidence and arguments. So, usually if you have the right funding (read: sales, not investment) you can find a lawyer who will construct a 112 / 115 defense with previously published works if you want to be safe; or can construct a “Teaches Against” defense to say your patent / process is unique. Think of patents like sanctions - there’s usually ways to get what you want in all environments. Not a lawyer just had to listen to them discuss my life’s work through robotic arguments. |
|