Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Blendtherules 1427 days ago
Good points about inspection time making it more interesting, I think a lot of people agree with you, and I find it very interesting personally. The RedBull thing was shown to me by a speedcuber who just wanted to point out that there are no inspection events out there, even though they aren't aimed solely at the speed cubing community.

Here's my issue. The statement "the world record for solving a rubiks cube is 3.47 seconds" is false. It took him longer than 3.47 seconds, we just don't count the extra time because of the rules of the game (which is a great game by the way).

2 comments

There's a lot of lines you can draw about what technically counts as the world record time. It's also incorrect to say that the world record is 3.47, because there are many on-camera examples of faster solves. They simply weren't done in the course of an official WCA event. The goal of the WCA isn't to most accurately determine what the world record is, it's to determine who can solve a cube the fastest in the context of an accessible and enjoyable competition. Trying to change WCA regulations to better match your personal definition of what counts as the world record is against the goals of the WCA.
A world record should also have a consistent course - but then it's just down to mechanics at that point.
Acctualllyyy the record for solving a Rubik’s cube is 3.47s plus the age of the person solving it.