|
|
|
|
|
by ignormies
1420 days ago
|
|
Having the change implemented from start-to-finish demonstrates a finished and thorough design. It also allows review to happen with the complete change at the forefront of the reviewers' minds. Kicking the completion of the implementation of a change you've started landing to an unspecified future date indicates poor engineering rigor imo. It's just begging for the change to perpetually be half-migrated and never finished. |
|