[apavlo]

But it's just a wrapper around SQLite. Skip the middleman and just use SQLite.

[pdpi]

Or don't skip the middleman and get a simple k/v interface instead of having to deal with a whole sqlite database.

[capableweb]

It's clearly not "just a wrapper around SQLite", read through the README and it'll be evident why.

[mosselman]

But you can’t access Sqlite over the web.

[goodpoint]

...and you shouldn't.

[jonnycomputer]

Seems to me that for a personal tool like this, sqlite3 is non-problematic.

https://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html

"Generally speaking, any site that gets fewer than 100K hits/day should work fine with SQLite. The 100K hits/day figure is a conservative estimate, not a hard upper bound. SQLite has been demonstrated to work with 10 times that amount of traffic."

[gkbrk]

Any concrete reasons? SQLite is probably good enough for 99% of websites / apps.

[goodpoint]

It's not designed to be straight exposed as a web service.

It's not hardened to handled malicious traffic.