|
|
|
|
|
by qeternity
1431 days ago
|
|
That’s now how this works, you come up with a hypothesis, and then prove it. You don’t do the opposite. So, why would a machine want to continue its existence? How would that feedback loop come to exist? In biology, Darwinian forces have a good explanation. I’ve never heard one for non-reproductive systems. We know exactly the cost function by which these models respond, because that’s basically the main element that humans have control over (that and training corpus). |
|