|
|
|
|
|
by na85
1434 days ago
|
|
Having worked briefly in military procurement, I can tell you the system is set up in a very bureaucratic way. Certainly there are companies that the military wants to buy from. For all the shit about the F-35, Lockheed Martin probably employs some of the greatest engineering teams on the planet. The C-130, for example, is probably one of if not the greatest aircraft ever designed. Anyways, there are certain companies that make things militaries want to buy, but for more mundane things like computers and pens and chairs, either there's a negotiated standing offer that legally has to be the first point of procurement, or it goes out to contracts. Unfortunately winning government contracts is a bit of a skill in and of itself and some firms have that skill and others don't. |
|
> The C-130, for example, is probably one of if not the greatest aircraft ever designed.
One of the benefits of not being a "sexy" project is that you don't have everyone and their mother trying to be part of the design process. You can tell the team that designed the C-130 was given two numbers: range and payload, and every other aspect of the design was determined by the engineers.