[Victerius]

I'll bite. Would you take the job for $300 000?

[asdff]

These comments are absurd considering farmhands get paid minimum wage to shovel huge pieces of manure

[lotsofpulp]

Each person’s opportunity cost is different. A farmhand shoveling huge pieces of manure for minimum wage probably does not have better options, whereas a software developer already earning a few hundred thousand does.

[ROTMetro]

Former software developer now ex-con. I would take this job for $50000. Also acceptable, $30000. Sad reality, I worked way way worse for way less than either of those two dream salary ranges.

[phyzome]

It's the singing arias about it that people are balking at.

[coding123]

I would do that for $1000 per hour.

[dmitrygr]

missing at least one zero

[ThePadawan]

I'd do it for $300k ...hourly.

[bell-cot]

"Thank you for considering us, but we were able to fill the position with a more-experienced candidate whose salary requirements were more in line with..."

[ThePadawan]

OK now we're definitely drifting into fantasy territory.

A company specifying an actual reason for rejecting a candidate? In writing??

(/j)