[royjacobs]

The example shown has 14GB of data, which is absolutely tiny, yet it can still rack up $40k in costs per day if used incorrectly (i.e. less than optimal, but not egregiously wrong)? Why would you use this?

[oefrha]

Scanned 6.67GB and processed for 2.41s, cost $40340.16 / 86400 = $0.4669. More than the hourly cost of AWS on-demand a1.x4large with 16 vCPU and 32GB of RAM.

Can’t think of a worse advertisement for their product.

[altdataseller]

Seriously, when i read this, i was like, there is no way i will ever use this example product they mentioned in TinyBird.

After reading it, i was curious what the writer’s relationship was with TinyBird. Was he/she a recent user?

Then i put my palm over my face..

[mcphage]

Plus, on what planet would you be refreshing that query every second of the day?

[didgetmaster]

Would that be the same planet where you can refresh a query every second that takes 2.4s to complete? How does that work?

[pixl97]

The one where some dev gets the query in a loop unintentionally and you discover your bankrupt the next day.

[_peregrine_]

This happens more often than you might think…