|
|
|
|
|
by salawat
1430 days ago
|
|
The market didn't become more perverse because no more land. It was perverse from it's inception, you just wouldn't come across the scaling issue until such time as population seeking space outstripped finite supply of land. Any market will run into this fundamental problem. The issue is apriori to market facillitated resource allocation systems. Whatever unit you use to represent value or as the unit of transaction; it will inevitably centralize once demand starts outstripping supply, and rent extraction becomes an effective capital amplifier. It's the magic of power laws. Everybody without capital assets pays everyone who has it. Those with it lift the prices by virtue of the fact they too are factored into average buying power amongst the potential set of transactors. That justifies higher asks, which decreases your non-capital owning members supply of transaction medium to devote to acquiring more capital which increases your rent extractors capability to diversify, rinse, repeat. There.
Is.
No.
Escape.
Except estate taxes, assuming no immortal legal fictions. In the presence of such, you're hosed for recreating a level playing field for latecomers. |
|