[onion2k]

if you need to use a particular app, you can only get it from a third-party store that you don't trust

This will be a problem but the solution is not to transfer your freedom to choose to Apple and just let them decide which third party apps you are allowed to use.

In some cases that will mean making a hard choice between accepting the risk of using the third party app store, or accepting that you won't be able to use certain apps. The benefits are significant though - your device will actually be under your control. You will be able to do all the things Apple prevent now.

[Tozen]

> ...the solution is not to transfer your freedom to choose to Apple and just let them decide...

Very good point. It's almost like people believing it to be better for a "benevolent" dictator to make all decisions, so that they won't be bothered with having to make choices.

Not every user wants to give over their freedom of choice to Apple (or any seemingly "kind" dictator), and many would prefer they can make decisions about what is best for their particular situation and based on their own preferences.

[_jal]

> This will be a problem but the solution is not to transfer your freedom to choose to Apple

Will the solution involve a method to negotiate degrees-of-freedom? Or perhaps a freedom grant method with revocation protocol? Do I get a little widget to see how free I am at the moment?

I'd love to see a laundry list of changes to industry practice, too. But the language employed for these compatibility fights is just getting goofy.

The F150 cup holder is enslaving me, somebody pass a law quick!

[s3r3nity]

> In some cases that will mean making a hard choice between accepting the risk of using the third party app store, or accepting that you won't be able to use certain apps.

You already have that choice today: I can buy into the walled-garden, or go to Android and side-load to my heart's content.

Clearly the market has chosen the preferred route. (I personally am also in the camp of preferring the simple, locked-down approach for my family that Apple has created.)

[dane-pgp]

> You already have that choice today: I can buy into the walled-garden, or go to Android and side-load to my heart's content.

So if Google decided to force this policy onto Android phones, you would support the EU introducing this legislation to bring back the option of side-loading?

Or would you want the legislation to only apply to Android phones, and not Apple devices?

[thefounder]

Give the Europeans the choice to own their device and install whatever they want!

[sangnoir]

> Clearly the market has chosen the preferred route

Indeed - iOS trails Android in Europe. With this law in effect, perhaps more Europeans will choose to buy iPhones