[prometheus76]

We already have rating systems and reviews that are human-generated and human-curated to help you decide if a book is "worthwhile". How could an AI language model improve on that? In other words, why would you trust AI more than human curators/reviewers?

[kadoban]

An AI could tailor it to the person, put it in context of other things already read, and essentially create a course of study for you. Humans can do the ~same, but it's pretty expensive.

An AI could also improve on the status quo by being more consistent and there's _some_ possibility that it could be less biased than in human in several ways.