[Beltalowda]

Anecdotally, I have to say I rarely have issues with FastMail's spam filtering, which uses SpamAssassin (not sure what their setup is exactly of course). I rarely get spam in my inbox (maybe an email or two a month), and it almost never marks things as false positives (last one was years ago).

[chaoz_]

SpamAssasin does ok only on subset of spam emails.. The problem is that underlying model is not capable to differentiate fake email from your boss (unless it's really simple) VS many other external emails you get.

I guess you would still want that 2nd level of protection for your ORG with sensitive data even if some "please buy X" - spam emails are still getting in.

Ofc Google is also not ideal :)

[Beltalowda]

> The problem is that underlying model is not capable to differentiate fake email from your boss (unless it's really simple) VS many other external emails you get.

But that's not really "spam", right? That's targetted phishing, which is quite a different thing.

[chaoz_]

If "spam == mail that user did not expect/want to receive", then phishing emails are also unwanted :)

It's all up to definitions, but yeah the two categories are different in nature.

[TheNewsIsHere]

My experience mirrors yours. Fastmail’s filtering is at least as good as Google’s for my inboxes, but Google and the other big players don’t seem to have spam filtering better than Fastmail’s on balance. Casually controlling for things like inbox age, I still get a bit more spam in my Google inboxes than in my Fastmail inboxes.

Once you’ve warmed up/activated the personal mail filter in Fastmail, it seems to work better than anyone else’s.