[mavelikara]

I am not upset. I, as you said, avoid them.

I was offering it as an explanation.

I believe that there are startups that need special engineering skills. The 40-for-founders-40-for-VCs-20-for-employees math don't incentivize those, though. Which is a shame.

At the turn of the century, a new crop of VCs with founder-friendly terms came about. The industry benefited from it. Many startups that would not have otherwise been founded, were successful.

I am hoping that the market will eventually bring about VCs and founders with employee-friendly terms.

Me commenting here is towards that goal. You have a right to disagree with me, but why argue that I should not be making this point?