[zacharytamas]

Ah, I see. Maybe I did read it wrong. Sorry about that.

Still I would think that credibility and trust is hampered by lack of information about the people behind it. I don't doubt there is more to the plan/idea than is represented on the site, but unfortunately when it's a flat website of "Coming Soon" you can't really find answers to your questions. I probably would have stated on the front page that more information is coming soon. Like someone else said I had the impression that it was already established and operational and I had only just heard about it. The copy is definitely written in this way. Like most people I clicked through the tabs for more information and was disappointed seven times in a row.

Anyway, </whine>. Good luck with it! I'll keep an eye on it to see the details that come out. :)

[grandalf]

OK thanks for the constructive feedback. I consider the overall feedback from HN to have been extremely positive and will incorporate all of the suggestions.

The concept has a few chicken/egg issues with ramp up, but why let that get in the way :)