> What exactly is your solution to the sort of naked aggression by Hitler in WW2? Is war not a solution to that problem?
With a 70–85 million death toll, I find it hard to describe it as a success. Saying there was no other choice seems fair but calling it a solution seems a bit far-fetched.
Whether it's circular or not isn't a meaningful property when bombs are dropping.
In that spirit of providing clarity: what is your answer to the un-translated question I asked?
> What exactly is your solution to the sort of naked aggression by Hitler in WW2? Is war not a solution to that problem?