|
|
|
|
|
by mindcrime
5344 days ago
|
|
So you're saying that providers are using these address ranges where you'd usually expect to see something like 10., 172.16-31. or 192.168.*? That is, purely internal traffic that's not routed over the public net? If so, I could buy that, but my question is "why?" That is, why not use an actual RFC1918 private address? Or is your point actually something different, and I'm just missing it? |
|