Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kayodelycaon 1440 days ago
Neat!

Turns out that woodpeckers don’t need extra shock-absorbers. They are small enough that the normal fluid around their brain provides the protection it needs.

1 comments

Begs the question what is the threshold of impact the cerebrospinal fluid around a human brain can absorb? How much protection does it provide?
Smaller animals are less massive, which makes the forces operating on them significantly less.

Our brains are too large and fragile and our fluid space is much thinner relative to our brains.

It's yet another application of the square-cube law. As the animal scales smaller, the frontal area of the brain goes down per the second power, while the mass goes down per the third power.
I'm trying to picture the double blind study on this one...
When I finally got over laughing at your incredibly funny response, I got to thinking seriously - the volume, density etc of fluid in the skull is well known together with the physical characteristics of the cranium, brain, etc. It would at the very least be revealing from either real or digital modeling to see what mechanical shock if any the fluid provides.
Not enough for some of the extremes humans manage to put it through. For example, the significant number of traumatic brain injuries in US Football
Exactly. What is not clear to me is whether the chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) from football, boxing etc, is just from the repeated blows to the head or if actual repeated/severe concussions are required. Is there a threshold of head trauma that will not cause CTE or is it all just a matter of degree such that we get a small amount of CTE even with minor blows to the head, and it just accumulates.