[pavelevst]

May be oot. As a maintainer I always try to accept help what people suggest, and make it even better. Without asking people to write tests or format code to match my preferences or make it cleaner…

I often fix some code in my fork, open a pr, but author asking for tests or change something but I simply have no time for it, and for author it will be much easier because he/she is familiar with code style, testing framework, etc. And problem remain unfixed in main repo

[capableweb]

Sure, if neither you or the maintainer has the time nor will to actually make the change mergable, then it probably won't get fixed.

But when this happen, do you do the same thing nshm does and writes about how the whole project is broken and they won't merge your uncompleted code?

[pavelevst]

If project is really broken then I would agree with it

[capableweb]

Sure, but given that ref-napi gets about 227K downloads each month, I find it very unlikely that the project as a whole is broken.

It might be broken for parent commentator that goes around complaining about it, because they encounter that specific bug. But seems not everyone is getting hit by it, then someone would at least contribute a fix to it, which no one has done yet.