[colejohnson66]

Legally, it doesn’t matter. Trademark law (not copyright) requires active enforcement to keep yours. So, even if it’s a joke, the act of making a networking related thing while Comcast has a trademark in that category is enough to make their lawyers wake up.

[wumpus]

Comcast has to actively enforce against ISPs or network providers.

Comcast the ISP doesn't have to actively enforce against Comcast brand tires or Comcast brand coffee.

A lot of people are confused about this, and big companies use "we have to actively enforce" as an excuse to crush companies in unrelated fields. But you don't.

[bee_rider]

"Duty to police" seems up there with "requirement to maximize profits" in the realm of excuses to indulge in the sort of bad behavior that execs are fond of.

[mypalmike]

Perhaps being on the front page of HN will be the catalyst which leads to the lawyers being informed.