|
|
|
|
|
by josh2600
1438 days ago
|
|
Telecom act of 1996 paid them to build fiber but they set the speed limits low enough that they could satisfy it with DSL. There’s new DSL tech that’s ~100mbps, so this is that technique again. The fatal flaw in 1996, like today, is not pushing for gigabit, and is one of the major reasons the US is a declining global power. Faster internet access is core infrastructure for participation in the 21st century. |
|
Do you have a factual basis for such a statement? Here is the text of the act.
https://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/tcom1996.txt
In fact, the text of the act doesn't mention fiber -- which part involves paying companies to build fiber? -- and one part is very explicit in not referring to a specific form of technology.
> The term `advanced telecommunications capability' is defined, without regard to any transmission media or technology, as high-speed, switched, broadband telecommunications capability that enables users to originate and receive high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications using any technology.
In fact, for a simple sanity-check on the factualness of your statement, we need just one question: If FedGov paid companies to build fiber -- which companies, and how much did it pay each of them?