[lotusmars]

Yeah, he was heading actual Nazi parades. There are enough videos on YouTube with him at the rallies wearing a leather jacket with saluting neo-Nazis around. He also uses N-words and F-words freely.

He first gained notoriety at 2003 parliament elections leading a pro-Putin ultranationalist party Rodina.

One of Rodina’s TV ads were comparing Caucausus people to street trash.

People say though that Rogozin is not a big believer in anything, he’s just a huge cynical careerist coming from a very privileged nomenclature background riding any wave that brings him to the top. Right now he’s one of the major pro-war hawks.

[theplumber]

>> N-words and F-words freely.

What are the F words? Fascist?

[lotusmars]

A slur word used against gay people.

[sam_lowry_]

Hm... my English is not good enough to guess it :-(

As for the N-word, there is a similarly sounding but fairly neutral Russian word which was OK to use until the influence of the US culture tarnished it.

[dekhn]

it's also used to refer to a bundle of wood in england.

[sam_lowry_]

Thanks, now I get it. Now... what's the Russian F-word that Rogozin was apparently using? гомик? педик? these are pejorative rather than grossly offensive. пидорас is probably the best translation, but it is more of a slur than a contentful word.

I am genuinely puzzled.

[lotusmars]

In Russia homophobia is such an integral part of society and day to day life (due to prison culture) that those horrific, dehumanizing and derogatory words you’ve mentioned are actually considered “pejorative rather than grossly offensive”

N-word as well. Ordinary Russians will fight tooth and nail for their right to use this word.

[kingofpandora]

> Yeah, he was heading actual Nazi parades. There are enough videos on YouTube with him at the rallies wearing a leather jacket with saluting neo-Nazis around. He also uses N-words and F-words freely.

> One of Rodina’s TV ads were comparing Caucausus people to street trash.

This seems to be a common trait across the political spectrum in Russia. The darling of the west, Alexei Navalny, is just as nationalist and xenophobic, and while he doesn't compare people from the Caucasus as trash, he did compare them to vermin that need to be exterminated in his TV ads.

[lotusmars]

It’s because there’s a huge support for these views in Russia.

And any politician who actually wants to succeed is bound to channel this energy or at least address it.

Russia has severe ongoing problems with national tensions and conflicts.

Not only between Russians and other nations but among those nations as well (e.g. ingush vs chechen).

Main reason is that Russia was built as a colonialist empire. Most ethnic regions had nothing in common except for being conquered.

That led to bad blood such as ongoing ethnic conflicts, disputed regions and insurgencies being crushed by Kremlin using mostly ethnically white army.

Multiple bombings of Grozny easily rival current destruction of Ukraine, along with mass rape and pillaging.

Conscripts were executed and tortured by locals which led to army’s brutal retaliation leading to cycle of violence.

Ethnic crime also contributed with some diasporas having immense powers in Moscow.

This boiling cocktail leads to a huge albeit suppressed anger amongst general population.

A politician who proposes disbanding Russian Federation and imposing a visa regime with ethnic regions will ride a wave of support not seen by Putin.

That’s why Putin crushes any nationalist opposition much harder than liberal one. It’s the biggest threat to his rule if there’s one.

Rogozin served mainly as a spoiler. His fake party sponged some dissent votes in 2003 and then disappeared. Once again even if his Nazi views are genuine, he’s a power hungry Machiavelist first.