|
|
|
|
|
by DocTomoe
1433 days ago
|
|
I wonder if it is more dehumanizing to the affected woman to show an attractive woman, or to not show women at all. I think to be consistent with the 'don't use women for ads' approach, you need to be opposed to use human-based or non-product-related human interest advertisement at all, which includes, but is probably not limited to men [1], children [2], the elderly [3], people of a certain demographic and/or sexual orientation and/or gender identity [4], or national rivalries [5][6] or stereotypes [7] or even the concepts of such. You would also have to have a stern look at the art scene, because sex also sells as sculpture, on canvas, as a particularly suggestive voice or on the screen - it may be part of the work, but it also has an advertising effect. And what a bleak world would that be. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C-vYY3SBDE
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqgSO8_cRio
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG4IaHgqH00
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw_gHMNs5iE
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWvKVE6rLI0
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g72KE8dmjc
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMQnPWjK5pE |
|