Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by laumars 1433 days ago
You're literally now just saying the same thing I was! It was a different frequency on the same signal. I never said it was chopped between frames! That's some weird conclusion you came to all by yourself. Hence why I said you're thinking digitally rather than of an analogue signal. Or at least not realising a broadcast transmission is broadband rather than narrowband.
1 comments

My mistake then. I triggered on what you wrote "That means audio will be encoded in the signal after the video frame."

It can be interpreted either way (at least by my brain) - chopped up after video, or "after video on the video tape but continuously".

I think this exchange is what they call "violent agreement" :-D