|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
1435 days ago
|
|
> In the context of RPC, is it still impractical? If you are defining a bespoke RPC protocol that incidentally uses some parts of HTTP without much concern about the spec but only concern with what existing infrastructure will do with requests, you haveā¦lots of freedom to design things however you want. OTOH, a lot of work has gone into handling almost every conceivable aspect of information interchange, within a REST style (because REST was both derived from the architecture of the Web and used in updating HTTP for HTTP/1.1) in the HTTP standards (there are some gaps still, like that addressed by the draft QUERY [0] method), why reinvent the wheel, unless you are specifically dealing with use cases squarely within the gaps? [0] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-meth... |
|