[wener]

React Context HMR still has problem. Due to this problem, I think nextjs still the better choice for react dev. Maybe vite supports too many frameworks, do not have enough time to handle the react problems.

[1]: https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/3301

[rk06]

Vite is framework agnostic. Framework specific work is spearheaded by framework specific community or core authors in some cases (solid, astro)

React falters because there are not many community contributing towards react integration.

Note: Vite team has done their job for react, but react itself has many concerns particularly due to commonjs that a dedicated person (or team) is needed for react

[ramesh31]

>Vite is framework agnostic. Framework specific work is spearheaded by framework specific community or core authors in some cases (solid, astro)

This is like saying NPM is language agnostic. Sure, technically it is. But we all know what it was built for and what the community is geared toward.

[benmccann]

Framework-agnosticism is not an afterthought in Vite, but has been there from the beginning. Svelte has gone all-in with Vite. Go to svelte.dev and the homepage instructs you to create a new project using Vite. We've never run into any problems with things being built for a specific framework in Vite.

[FinalBriefing]

It's a JavaScript bundler. If a framework is doing weird stuff with imports, or using legacy module builds, that's on the framework to fix...or not.

Angular is the same way, it has its own compiler and relies on custom build-time code to work. That's also why it isn't picked up by a lot of newer build tools that generally just work with normal JS.

[EvanYou]

This analogy is plain wrong. The blog post lists multiple non-Vue frameworks/tools using Vite as their default build tool. Compare that to the number of non-JS languages (excluding ones that compile to JS) using NPM as their default package manager (0).

[__ryan__]

…Vue in this case?

[ramesh31]

Yes.

[gedy]

Nextjs and vite are not really comparable, they are two different things. NextJS is an application framework, vite is a dev/build tool.

(With that said, I'd love to see Next use Vite, but iirc the webpack dev works for Vercel [Nextjs parent] now)

[no_wizard]

They seem to be very heavily invested in the long game that is SWC[0][1] which will eventually replace webpack as a whole as well

[0]: https://swc.rs/

[1]: https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/compiler

[_fat_santa]

At this point we know that Webpack is dead. Unless there is a new release that rewrites it in Rust or Go and makes it comparable in speed to Vite/SWC which will never happen. The two different approaches seem to be either going with SWC or Vite. I'm honestly not sure which one will prevail, or if they will both co-exist, splitting the previous market share taken up by Webpack.

[wener]

But, vite is working on to become the next nextjs, like ssr, isg etc. Nextjs only support react, so it's easier to leverage the react's ability to do these.

When there is ssr, there is runtime, more than just a dev/build tool.

[benmccann]

It sounds like you might have some misunderstanding. You can write SSR applications with Vite, but each framework or application is responsible for the rendering. There isn't really such a thing as an SSR runtime in Vite. It will run code on the development server in SSR mode, but all it does is make sure it's picking up code updates and passes it through to Node.js.

[simlevesque]

> vite is working on to become the next nextjs, like ssr, isg etc

That does not seem to be the truth. They offer a very different product than Next.

[nilsbunger]

That issue is disappointing. It's an important issue for making React work, it's been open for over a year, and there isn't any comment from someone who works on vite or the plug-in.