[CaptWillard]

Who told you that? Have you been paying attention the last 6-10 years?

I'm sorry, but the credibility of those networks has completely inverted.

That's not my opinion. The vast majority of media-fueled outrages that were blasted by MSNBC and CNN over the last 6-10 years have proven to be cynical distortions or extrapolation at best, and many times outright fabrication.

Meanwhile, "conspiracy theories" are consistently turning out to be relatively accurate, which is a double whammy as the MSM are the ones telling you they are conspiracy theories.

[corrral]

> I'm sorry, but the credibility of those networks has completely inverted.

When I'm at my parents' house and Fox News is on (as it always is) I can google a pretty high percentage of things they're "covering" and find they're bullshit. The most-used, but not only, tactic is to report something ordinary as if it's new and sinister, omitting all context. They do it constantly.

To be fair, maybe you're right and CNN and MSNBC are even worse. Dunno, I've mostly known people from center-left to far-left (plus a few that defy categorization) in my social circles for most of my life, and none of them have ever thought either network was worth a damn.

[V__]

> That's not my opinion.

That is your opinion. There is no factual basis on which to claim that Fox (which is part of the MSM btw.) is somehow more factual or better news than the rest. This of course doesn't mean that the rest is good, just not as crazy bad.

> "conspiracy theories" are consistently turning out to be relatively accurate

Absolutely.. if you you are part of some right-wing-bubble.

Sincerely, your George Soros sponsored online shill.