|
|
|
|
|
by AaronFriel
1432 days ago
|
|
Given the capacity, I would be surprised if it wasn't single-level cell NAND (larger write capacity) or redundant. From articles I could find, it was installed in the JWST in 2012[1] and developed by a company called SEAKR which produces "Solid State Recorders"[2]. Certainly doesn't look like any commercial server storage I've seen. I imagine the contracts could be FOIAed here and specs like anticipated write capacity obtained, would be very interesting to learn about radiation hardening and redundancy for SSDs - err, solid state recorders - in space. [1] https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/information-...
[2] https://www.seakr.com/our-technology/#products |
|
I suspected something like that. I assumed there was a reason there was "only" 65GB of storage up there, when I can get a half terabyte microSD card for under $70 on PrimeDay. Lots of Moore's Law has happened in the last 10 years...
As a RaspberryPi enthusiast, I'm under no illusions about the reliability of microSD cards, but I wonder whether if they were building that data recorder today, that a huge raid 1 with perhaps 20 or 50 mirrors stored on 512GB SD cards might be able to compete on reliability and cost (including launch weight)?