[samstave]

I'm convinced we are receiving "Wobbly Photons"

Meaning that no matter waht, when we speak of gravitational lenses, we could, usting JWST account for the "wobble" of a photon, nased on the accurate knowledge of where a body was, via measuring through multiples of JSWT observations... (ideally through actually multiple JWSTs, in differnt locations)

The idea being that if we can triangulate a more precice location between earth [A] and galaxy [N] - set of all galaxies/bodies/whatever,

We may be able to calculate the influence of gravity lens upon phont differentials based on when they came from and how far...

Ultimately making adjustments to the output of an image \based on super deep-field focus which is effectively selecting to the phtons of interest... and we can basically "carbon date" the accuracy of an image with a higher resolution?

[supernovae]

We already calculated the gravity and mapped it out. Here is a paper on some of the research: https://www.kiss.caltech.edu/papers/darkmatter/papers/the_da...

What i think is pretty cool is that the gravity lens actually allowed hubble to see galaxies it may have not ever seen had there not been a gravity lens and now that we have JWST we see many more distant galaxies (and more of the same galaxy reflected in more positions)

[samstave]

Why have we not seen results of these scopes pointing at near bodies?

What does jupiter, PLUTO look like from these lenses???

THE FUCKING MOON

WE SPENT *BILLIONS* -- Why dont we have live streams?

GO FUCK YOUR NSA

--

WHO PAID FOR IT.

The data should be global. define a SINGLE national defense trope. and back it up.