[realmod]

> it went all in on China's debt trap diplomacy

No. Debt owed to China is less than 10% of Sri Lanka's total debt. And it owes a lot more to western nations/institutes.

I'm still shocked how this clearly unsubstantiated claim continues to circulate. The so called "China debt trap diplomacy" is a phenomenon mostly fabricated/promoted by columnists with a clear agenda.

[rmk]

A lot of the debt is not even disclosed, so your 10% number, particularly from a country such as Sri Lanka which has some extremely corrupt leaders, should be taken with a fistful of salt. America and Europe have stringent anti-corruption laws when dealing with both domestic and foreign entities. China has none of that, and in fact, it does not care or raise human rights or other ethics concerns when lending to countries (on questionable terms and often in secret with no transparency or accountability). To add to the opacity, China does not publish any details of such lending, whereas a lot of American and European lending is done through institutions that operate with a much higher level of transparency.

[unmole]

> A lot of the debt is not even disclosed

This is handwavy, conspiratorial nonsense. By what mechanism is sovereign debt concealed? How the fuck is the debt serviced if it is hidden?

[rmk]

Nothing of that sort. Repeated investigations of Chinese debt by different groups yield the recurring theme of confidentiality, very high interest rates over very compressed repayment periods that border on predatory, non participation in Paris Club (which exists to resolve debtor nations' problems in an orderly, reasonable manner), extensive use of cash collateral in offshore accounts... All of them very much against modern and international norms, and extremely secretive.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-china-emerging-debt/datab...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Club