Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throw827474737 1434 days ago
As if it is only black or white... if you get sunburn its definitely worse than the benefits from sunexposure, and Vitamin D also builds fine without sunburning exposure times and with sunscreen, and then it is also about when/which sun..

Anyway, downvotes most likely were for how strangely arguments were lined up by GP..

1. there is a large healthy range between unhealthy lack of enough sun and unhealthy sun exposure (and you can shift that with sunscreen).

2. Lack of sun has not much to do with obesity.

Saying between the lines that suncreen is unhealthy and makes you fat.. yeah I know he didn't say, but..

3 comments

https://www.outsideonline.com/health/wellness/sunscreen-sun-...

I think based on the studies linked in the source above quite a lot of what you've stated as plain fact is easily debatable.

1. Does not seem like Vitamin D supplementation provides any of the benefits that are linked to Vitamin D from sun exposure.

2. The maladies strongly linked to being combatted by said Vitamin D kill far, far more Americans (700,000) than melanoma (7,000) a year.

3. Obesity and vitamin D have a pretty strong experimental link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691711/

Sorry, meant to post the connections people are researching between vitamin-D deficiency and obesity:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691711/

Surprise: normal-weight people spend time sunbathing, while obese people do not.

This is a great example of why correlation does not imply causation.

Note that there are few ethical ways to prove single variable causation over long times in human studies :)
Yeah, nothing happened to humans without sunscreen in the past 299900 years, what will it do now?