|
|
|
|
|
by rdtsc
5333 days ago
|
|
I see where you are headed but that is bad logic. It is like saying your car may catch on fire anytime or a meteorite can strike so why bother also wearing a seat belt? Sorry you cannot possibly defend un-acknowledged writes as a default setting on a product that calls itself a database. Saying you need 3 machines anyway. By coming up with more arguments and excuses as a defense for this design you are actually making the product you are defending look worse. |
|
but the poster to which i was replying seemed to be saying that machine redundancy was somehow optional. it is not. hardware fails, and the architecture of whatever db server you are using is irrelevant when it does.