|
|
|
|
|
by tablespoon
1434 days ago
|
|
> I think we all forget though just how poor the quality was back then, and what we've become accustomed to, with VHS being 240 lines, DVD 480p, etc. It's like reminiscing about the first iPhone and then looking at one and realizing how damn small it actually was compared to modern versions. I think the "what we've become accustomed to" is the most important factor there. Back in the VHS/NTSC days, without experience of anything else, I had not complaints about the quality. |
|
- Tapes would get chewed by the player
- Took an age to find the right recording (you’d spend an age constantly rewinding)
- Tapes would degrade the more you used them
- sometimes they wouldn’t even sync vertically with your TV. Requiring all sorts of fun and games tuning your hardware
- audio was often muffled and sounded like it was played through a sock
- if you shared a household there was always the risk that someone would tape over your favourite recording
- and even just getting the same content recorded was a game of chance. If the TV network was early or late airing your show or movie, there was a good chance you’ll end up missing some of it (back then there wasn’t an EPG so you had to programmed the VCR to start at a specific time rather than the start of a specific show).
Not to mention my younger brother kept jamming Lego into the VCR (but at least that’s not the fault of the technology).
I hated VHS. Switched to DVD the moment I could. Even though my computer wasn’t powerful enough to playback DVD properly I still massively preferred it.