[IncRnd]

I didn't change the game. That is literally what the tweet was conveying. It then expanded the first claim by what was also a correct statement that each atom could be replaced with a universe of atoms, and still that would not not exceed the number of states in a Kilobyte of memory.

What many people have done is interpret that to mean that somehow complexity theory is broken or that the tweet author was arguing for multiverses. It appears that not everyone actually read the tweet.

> What you’re saying is true— if you replace an abstract state with an atom

That is not at all what was written in my comment. There is no replacement being mentioned anywhere.

[barakm]

> and replaced it with a copy of the observable universe, and then did it again

Sorry, it was totally in the tweet. Literally used the word replaced