|
|
|
|
|
by xt00
1442 days ago
|
|
Yea presently a new technology benefits consumers because essentially it makes something previously more expensive now cheaper, but just like Netflix once the contracts all expire the artists and labels will say, we want more money — so suddenly Spotify premium will cost more money and the spotify non premium will have even more ads. |
|
At $13/mo, Spotify Premium costs $156/yr.
On the other hand, the cost of a CD album is $10-$15 new. Used, borrowed it’s even cheaper. So for that amount you can buy 10-15 albums new. Which will be with you forever. And you can now get digital singles for $0.25-$2.
Discovery is still possible or even better through good old fashioned radio or internet radio, which is what both Spotify and Apple are recreating through curated playlists and literally radio for Apple.
And if you want to listen to an individual song, ad supported free options are available across the internet, which labels and artists are thrilled to provide you since it gives you an incentive to buy the album/song and/or pay for a live performance ticket.
I’ve been budgeting about $100/yr for the last few years, and by leveraging sales, etc. my collection means I struggle to spend even $30-$40/yr now, which means that I have $60-$70 which i use to support a variety of smaller artists whose music I may catch live and buy the albums they burned on their PCs for $10.
Obviously this isn’t ideal for all. Those who love to listen to all the newest music all the time would be better off with the streaming services, but I suspect a surprisingly large percentage of people may be better off just buying their music if they have the patience to build their library over a few years, or the money to put down a large upfront investment.