[wronglyprepaid]

> If you rush and do what you are saying without finding an efficient way to store a surplus of energy then you will have blackouts come winter.

But this is only a problem while the economy is still in transition[1], once the transition has completed this will not be a problem.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases...

[nradov]

Transition to what exactly? The link in your comment doesn't seem relevant.

[wronglyprepaid]

To a carbon negative anti-racist economy that values LBGTIQ+ lives and the rights of birthing people.

[worik]

I want to live in a positive society. "Anti-racist" "Carbon-negative" are both unattractive to me.

Without racism should be a property, not an identity. (I would go further: without bigotry). Ditto carbon.

Valuing lives is important. New ones. Black ones. Old ones. Gay ones. Etcetera. (All lives [will] matter [when ** lives matter])....

[binbag]

Are you joking?

[kragen]

Trolling, it appears; see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32046022

[worik]

That is not trolling. It is having and expressing an opinion.

[kragen]

What do you think now that you see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32048756? Note that the paper they linked, which seems to be in earnest, doesn't mention trans rights.

[kragen]

Now they have been banned for trolling: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32049186

[kragen]

Poe's Law can make it hard to tell, but to me it looks like someone satirizing the extremes of anti-capitalist ideology. Surely there is someone somewhere who agrees that some LGTBTQI+ issue constitutes a real argument against grid-scale energy storage, but if they were the person who is commenting here, probably they would have tried to explain what the relationship is instead of just appending keyword salad.