[ImPostingOnHN]

>If Hindus were so bad as you want to made out to be

I stopped reading there, when you pivoted from defending viewpoints to attacking the person you're discussing with

when you need to misrepresent what I've said so early on in trying to make your point, it means your point is bad -- twitter-discussion-level-bad -- so keep such discussion misbehavior there, please

[throwaway_9120]

- You come with lack of knowledge of the issue in the discussion.

- You present half truths

- You cast aspersions on Indian judiciary because supposedly Hindus will only support Hindus.(I am giving you a benefit of doubt and took liberty to convert “jury” to judiciary. If you really meant jury you should never ever discuss India)

When I call that out and also tried telling you what actual minority of India* thinks about Hindus in general, I am the one who is misrepresenting. Wow! ( Perhaps you were left with no intelligent counter argument, so simply attack me and accuse me of misrepresenting)

Please try these tactics some where else, HN is certainly not the place.

*Edit: Typo

[ImPostingOnHN]

I do none of those things, and your response is nothing but more pathetic attempts to redirect the discussion to be about me (ad hominem attacks/fallacies)

this tells me that your positions are indefensible on their own merits, and that you have no substantial response to the actual points I raised

[throwaway_9120]

Since when countering half truths is known as an attack?

Since when countering lack of knowledge is known as a fallacy?

I have answered each and every half-truth filled query of yours. You chose to play victim when you found you were left with no answers.

Someone more sensible and mature would have apologized and moved-on for this sheer lack of knowledge about the issue and the country.

Perhaps I should have stopped myself when you used the term "jury" in Indian context.

Keep basking in the glory of your ignorance and keep playing a victim card!