|
|
|
|
|
by dibujante
1436 days ago
|
|
It is! But their architecture should enable them to hit a much lower price point. Maybe it's just charging what the market will bear? If this is what they need to charge to be profitable, though, that indicates the satellite-to-satellite approach doesn't scale well, or they've been losing money. |
|
Your actual cost is irrelevant.