|
|
|
|
|
by wongarsu
1445 days ago
|
|
There's no technical or legal reason that the word "purchase" doesn't imply an irrevocable, transferable license (for one person at a time), as well as the requirement that the "seller" makes the licensed good indefinitely available to license holders (for a fee appropriate to cost of doing so). If they don't like that, don't call it a purchase. Anything less is just eroding the meaning of the word. |
|