|
|
|
|
|
by Juliate
1447 days ago
|
|
It's not the only alternative, it's an inevitable part of the mix, where it serves as the raw large power source (similar to hydraulic, only much larger). Until we have found ways to drastically cut down power usage AND to store huge quantities of energy OR found another similar and cleaner and safer energy source, we will need it in the mix to balance with other renewable sources. |
|
And I am sorry to say but the many countries have made great strides on running their countries on more and more renewable energy sources.
In 2018, Scotland generated 98% their energy from wind alone.
Denmark 72%, Germany 45%, Uruguay 97%, Norway 93%.
It's a whole patchwork of solutions, depending on geography.
Nuclear is not this magic bullet, and just means flipping a switch, it has a major cost, logistical, technological and risk overhead associated with it. If you are France, great, but they have been doing Nuclear since the beginning, it doesn't mean that the world has to do the same, when far simpler, cheaper and safer alternatives are in abundance.