|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
1450 days ago
|
|
I can't believe I'm going to defend NFTs, but ... _if_ copyright law were satisfied that you aren't infringing if you purchased perpetual access to a copy--digital or otherwise--then "a glorified receipt" could be all that was needed _if_ the system honoured users with a right to access, on any system on which it was available, for cost, a work that has been legally purchased. In USA, I can't see why proof of purchase and TPB wouldn't be enough. Platform issues don't negate the rights you purchased. |
|
Why would these stores use NFTs attached to ownership licenses when they could just reword their ToS to include ownership. They don’t want to sell ownership to begin with so they would never use NFTs either.