[bayindirh]

As a person who doesn't like systemd a lot (yet doesn't hate it either), I find some of the criticisms well founded.

I've written them in the past, so I'll not re-iterate these walls of text, but all in all, systemd had to learn some things over and over just because it disregarded people's warnings about the problems some of these design patterns create.

Being a little agreeable and open to discourse is not a bad thing.

All in all, systemd makes different trade-offs w.r.t. design, and is not radically fast when compared to what's coming before that. Capability wise it made some things easier (not possible), and some things way more harder.

It's just another iteration. Hope he doesn't pulls another "De Icaza", and all goes well for him.

OTOH, I can't trust neither him, nor Microsoft, because I look actions rather than words.

Let's see.