|
|
|
|
|
|
by remram
1437 days ago
|
|
|
Those are a lot like containers though. Mac .app files are not just binary (MACH-O), they can include libraries, "frameworks", etc that will override what's loaded from the system. AppImage is even worse [1]. .exe are usually setup with an installer that trigger the side-by-side assembly mechanism, pretending that the system is using the version of the libraries that you included (and growing your WinSXS folder forever). JAR files usually include all their required transitive dependencies rather than "dynamic linking" with other JARs. [1]: AppImage official documentation: "Do not depend on system-provided resources" https://docs.appimage.org/introduction/concepts.html#do-not-... |
|
|