|
|
|
|
|
by ck2
5337 days ago
|
|
Yes if a company makes higher profits by eliminating workers then they should lose the savings from their taxes. If they moved the profit and terminated the workers, that year they would still have to pay full taxes. The new company would not have people for a year so no credits - they also wouldn't have profits to pay taxes on either. There is no way to game the system, you cannot shuffle workers because you lose credits. Why is this so complicated to appreciate? A large corporation's worth to society is not to ship jobs overseas but to create domestic jobs. How else do you encourage them to not ship jobs overseas and get slave labor for pennies? |
|
Personally I don't think so. But perhaps that's because to me, Poonam is a real girl, very short, who makes frowny faces in google chat and real life when I tease her. Maybe I'd think differently if Poonam was a faceless foreign devil.
(Note: The girl is real, the name is not.)
Also, you are simply wrong that a corporation's value is creating jobs. It isn't. A corporation's worth is the consumer surplus their products create. If my company helps a woman find a dress she values at $100 and she pays $80 for it, she gains a consumer surplus of $20. How much of that $20 we are responsible for is dependent on what her NBA would have been.