[zo1]

The real problem here is that we as a society are broken and would absolutely slaughter Valve if they had variable pricing for this in-demand product. E.g. if Valve were to offer Steamdecks at twice the price for you to get to the head of the queue. Scalpers wouldn't exist in that situation unless even that "price point" wasn't satisfying everyone in the market. E.g. what about Bill Gates that wants one right now, shouldn't he be allowed to call up Valve and say "1 mill, I want to get my hands on this thing today!".

There is a gap in the market for whatever reason, and the scalpers are exploiting it. We may not like it, it may be a dirty practice, but it's filling a price-point that people are willing to pay. Not only that, but because Valve is unwilling to offer the product at a specific price/availability rate, they actively created the scalper market.

[Shared404]

> what about Bill Gates that wants one right now, shouldn't he be allowed to call up Valve and say "1 mill, I want to get my hands on this thing today!".

I'm of the opinion that this should be allowed - when it's a direct interaction between the purchaser and seller.

Any purchaser has the right to contact any seller and say I'll give you N*$ORIGINAL_PRICE to try to purchase something out of line. I'll agree that there's nothing wrong with reselling something you purchased, at whatever price you can - as long as it wasn't purchased specifically for that purpose, and _especially_ as long as automation wasn't involved.

[Forgeties79]

>there is a gap in the market for whatever reason

A gap that is further expanded by the existence of scalpers, which is a huge part of the problem. They’re making a problem worse and in some extreme cases even making a problem where there wasn’t one or it was at least minimal (happens with concerts all the time). Theres a reason so many big items/pre-orders/concerts etc. have invested in queue systems and limit purchase numbers. The ones that don’t are inviting scalpers.