|
|
|
|
|
|
by origin_path
1442 days ago
|
|
|
Isn't that a contradiction? If it could have passed in the Obama years but was ignored, then it simply wasn't a priority to do so, which was the original point made. Obama years were pretty recent. Does the court have an agenda here, or is this the removal of a previous agenda? I don't understand these claims that the court is simply doing the same as before but right wing instead of left. They haven't changed things to make abortion illegal at the federal level. They've just removed a ruling based on shaky legal reasoning and kicked the decision back to where it was meant to be all along, which would seem to be lack of an agenda. |
|
|