|
|
|
|
|
by senortumnus
1437 days ago
|
|
Surgeon here who does the majority of my “major case” work robotically. Author of this article has a coastal-centric point of view. My residency was apprenticeship model and I graduated very confident in my capabilities to perform robotic surgery “skin-to-skin”. The phenomenon he references about trainees no longer being able to start a surgery without the “attending” surgeon present is not related to robotics. It is due to CMS or liability (lawyers) or hospital policy regulations (lawyers). Same reason medical students are pushed away from direct patient care until they graduate and become residents. See the article on HN yesterday for which the comment section was chock full of “tear down the health bureaucracy” rhetoric. If the general public comes out saying “we want trainees working on us, if it creates better doctors and lowers health care costs” then the system can become much simpler and get back to the old days of higher autonomy for trainees in academic centers. Until then, advice for future surgeons: if you want to learn how to operate during residency, consider a program in the midwest without a lot of fellows. |
|
The skills issue you identify with some big-name programs is a real thing for sure, though.