[krageon]

Within the larger context of this thread, the intent was clear. You yourself were responding to a post that gives this necessary context: Intellectual property is absurd and evil. The poster you reply to tells you why it is absurd and evil. Those two things together lead you naturally to the conclusion that it must be abolished.

As such, I would say what they said is absolutely what I claimed. I just explained it in plainer terms and without requiring you to (re)read the rest of the thread.

Edit: The fact that you summarised "this system must be destroyed" as "hopeless" says something about your own fundamental hopelessness and despair. Which you kind of ironically attributed to someone else.

[zasdffaa]

> Intellectual property is absurd and evil

I don't agree, just the excessive enforcement of it may well be.

> The fact that you summarised "this system must be destroyed" as "hopeless" says something

No. What I said was:

> hopeless valueless post.

The post was valueless because it gives no direction, no means. And I detest such posts because they offer nothing useful. They are unconstructive. Hence are valueless.

[krageon]

With respect, if we can't even constructively discuss what you yourself said I think we will go nowhere and we are wasting each others' time.